Interpretation, Semiotics and Qualitative Research in Hypnosis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62506/phs.v1i1.9Keywords:
Hypnosis, Interpretation, Qualitative Research, SemioticsAbstract
The present work seeks to highlight some relevant references to conceive the interpretation of clinical and qualitative research in hypnosis. Starting from a brief case rapport, he discusses three important references under a semiotic and complex reading: the universe of experience of the subject, impressions and descriptions, and the problem of form. In the first reference, he emphasizes that the interpretations must contemplate the own semiotic production of the experience of the subject. In the second, that the impressions and description processes need to be integrated into the research. In the third, that the construction of interpretation needs to conceive and deal with problems of form, such as deformation (influence), information (addition of knowledge) and transformation (reconfiguration of experience). The article concludes by pointing out that, although this discussion is still initial, it points out ways to a collective discussion around the subject, as they are pertinent in terms of research and hypnosis.
References
Bioy, A. (2018). “O pequeno teatro da hipnose”: uma leitura clínica do funcionamento hipnótico. Em M. Neubern (org.). Clínicas do transe. Etnopsicologia, hipnose e espiritualidade no Brasil. (pp. 49 – 68). Curitiba: Juruá.
Brito, O. & Pesce, S. (2015). De la recherche qualitative à la recherche sensible. Paris: Champ.
Clément, C. (2011). L’appel de la transe. Paris, Stok.
Colapietro, V. (1989). Peirce’s approach to the self. New York: Suny.
Creswell, J. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design. New York: Sage.
Demo, P. (2000). Metodologia do conhecimento científico. São Paulo: Atlas.
Erickson, M. (1954). Special techniques of brief hypnotherapy. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 2, 109 – 129.
Erickson, M. & Rossi, E. (1980). The collected papers of Milton H. Erickson, MD. New York, Irvington.
Gallagher, S. (2012). Multiple aspects of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 15-31.
Gonzalez Rey, F. & Mitjans, A. (2017). Subjetividade: teoria, epistemologia e método. Campinas: Alínea.
Ionescu, S. & Blanchet, A. (2009). Méthodologie de la recherche en psychologie clinique. Paris: PUF.
Jappy, T. (2013). Introduction to peircean visual semiotics. New York: Bloomsbury.
Jensen, M. & Patterson, D. (2014). Hypnotic approaches for chronic pain management. American Psychologist, 2, 167-177.
Kim, J. (2015). Understanding narrative inquiry. London: Sage Publications.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lévy, A. (1997). Sciences cliniques et organisations sociales. Paris: Puf.
Morin, E. (2001). La méthode V. l’Identité humaine. Paris: Seuil.
Nathan, T. (2001). Nous ne sommes pas seuls au monde. Paris: Seuil.
Neubern, M. (2016). Iconicidade e complexidade na comunicação hipnótica. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 32(esp), 1 – 9.
Neubern, M. (2017a). Iconicidade como possibilidade de pesquisa qualitativa da hipnose. Psicologia em Estudo, 22, 505-515.
Neubern, M. (2017b). Contribuições epistemológicas da hipnose de Milton Erickson para a Psicologia Moderna. Em D. Amparo; E. Lazzarini; I. Silva; Polejack, L. (eds). Psicologia Clínica e Cultura Contemporânea 3. (pp. 684-709). Brasília: Technopolitik.
Neubern, M. (2018). Clínicas do transe. Etnopsicologia, hipnose e espiritualidade no Brasil. Curitiba: Juruá.
Nöth, W. (2012). Charles S. Peirce’s theory of information: a theory of the growth of symbols and of knowledge. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 19 (2), 137 – 161.
Nöth, W. (2015). The paradigms of iconicity in language and literature. Em M. Hiraga (org). Iconicity: east meets west. (pp. 13 – 34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Peirce, C. (1998). The essential Peirce. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Roustaing, F. (2015). Jamais contre, d’abord: la présence d’un corps. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Schore, A. (2016). Affect regulation and the origin of the self. New York: Routledge.
Stengers, I. (2002). Hypnose: entre magie et science. Paris: Seuil.
Zeig, J. (2014). The induction of hypnosis. Phoenix: Milton Erickson Foundation Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
