The encounter as the primary task of phenomenology. Reciprocity and inequal-ity in Buytendijk.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62506/phs.v2i1.75

Keywords:

Buytendijk, encounter, Phenomenology, relationship with other, Otherness

Abstract

The paper present and discuss F. J J. Buytendijk’s essay Phenomenology of Encoun-ter. Initially, we briefly situate the relevance off the problem of encounter on phenomenology, taking Husserl and Lévinas as opposite parameters. We will see that Buytendijk himself make use of numerous authors from phenomenology as key pieces to the composition of the essay, such as Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty and Binswanger. Next, we try to explicit in his essay the question of encounter based on four topics: the place of encounter, which has an existential character engaged on historical and social context; ambiguity, as the essential mark of the en-counter; reciprocity, as the condition of encounter, most of the time ia a situation of inequality, highlighting the question of social roles; and its balance to phenomenology, in which the en-counter isn’t a subject among others, but the starting point to the phenomenology and inter-rogation of our own experiences. Finally, we end with questions and final considerations, with which we seek to assume Buytendijk’s essay legacy for ourselves.

Author Biographies

André Dias de Andrade

Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de
Ciências da Saúde - Campus I, Departamento de
Educação Física.

Reinaldo Furlan

Professor Livre Docente, Universidade de
São Paulo – USP (Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências
e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de
Psicologia)

References

Barbaras, R. (2011). Investigações fenomenológicas, Em direção a uma fenomenologia da vida. Curitiba: Editora UFPR.

Buytendijk, F. J. J. & Plessner, H. (1936). Die Physiologische Erklärung des Verhaltens. Acta Biotheor 1, 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02147637

Buytendijk, F. J. J. (1952). Phénoménologie de la rencontre. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.

Dekkers, W. J. M. (1995). F.J.J. Buytendijk’s concept of an anthropological physiology. Theoretical Medicine 16, 15–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993786

Husserl, E. (1976). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Husserliana. Band VI. Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

Husserl, E. (1953). Méditations cartésiennes. Paris: J. Vrin.

Husserl, E. (1959). Troisième colloque philosophique de Royaumont, 23-30 avril 1957 [organisé par le Cercle culturel de Royaumont]. Paris: Minuit.

Mahéo, G. (2012). Binswanger, La réponse de l’amour. Alter Révue de Phénoménologie, 20, 111-128.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1948). Sens et non Sens. Paris: Gallimard.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2001). Psychologie et pédagogie de l’enfant, Cours de Sorbonne 1949-1952. Lagrasse (FR): Éditions Verdier.

Sartre, J-P. (1947). Situations, I. Essais Critiques. Paris: Gallimard.

Silva, C. A. F. (2014). A dança da vida: Buytendijk e a fenomenologia do encontro. Revista Estudos Filosóficos (UFSJ), 13, pp. 73-86. Disponível em: http://www.seer.ufsj.edu.br/index.php/estudosfilosoficos/article/view/2122

Published

2021-04-22

How to Cite

Andrade, A. D. de, & Furlan, R. (2021). The encounter as the primary task of phenomenology. Reciprocity and inequal-ity in Buytendijk. Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences, 2(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.62506/phs.v2i1.75