Gestalt theory and phenomenological method in Gurwitsch and Merleau-Ponty

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62506/phs.v2i2.125

Keywords:

Gestalt, Psychology, Phenomenology, Gurwitsch, Merleau-Ponty

Abstract

In this essay I examine the different views that Gurwitsch and Merleau-Ponty hold on the phenomenological relevance of Gestalt psychology. Against Husserl’s dismissal of the latter on the grounds of its purported “naturalism,” they each claim that the Gestaltist critique of psychological atomism releases a transcendental perspective in the study of perception. However, they find themselves in disagreement as to what phenomenological status should be granted the transcendental nature of the Gestalt. I argue that the central point of contention revolves around the application of the eidetic method of Husserl. Whereas for Gurwitsch in-vestigations pursued in line with Gestalt theory turn out to be noematic analyses, confronting the subject with ideal unities disclosed in eidetic assertions, Merleau-Ponty is critical of this identification, as it seems to him to imply a form of dualism. I conclude by critically con-fronting Gurwitsch’s reading of Gestalt theory with that of Merleau-Ponty, emphasizing the originality of the French philosopher’s characterization of the Gestalt as an originary figure of preobjective being.

Author Biography

Erik Lind, Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

Post-Graduate Student, Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.

References

Embree, L. (1981). "Gurwitsch’s Critique of Merleau-Ponty." Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 12(2), 151-163.

Gurwitsch, A. (1966). "Edmund Husserl’s Conception of Phenomenological Psychology." The Review of Metaphysics, 19(4), 689-727.

Gurwitsch, A. (2009b). The Collected Works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973), Volume II: Studies in Phenomenology and Psychology (F. Kersten, Ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.

Gurwitsch, A. (2010). The Collected Works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901–1973), Volume III: The Field of Consciousness: Phenomenology of Theme, Thematic Field, and Marginal Consciousness (R. M. Zaner & L. Embree, Eds.). Dordrecht: Springer.

Heinämaa, S. (2009). "Phenomenological Responses to Gestalt Psychology." In S. Heinämaa & M. Reuter (Eds.), Psychology and Philosophy. Inquiries Into the Soul From Late Scholasticism to Contemporary Thought (pp. 263-284). Dordrecht: Springer.

Husserl, E. (1969). Formal and Transcendental Logic (D. Cairns, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Husserl, E. (1973). Experience and Judgment. Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic (J. S. Churchhill & K. Ameriks, Trans., L. Landgrebe, Ed.). Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.

Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology (F. Karsten, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Husserl, E. (2001). Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis. Lectures on Transcendental Logic (A. J. Steinbock, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Koffka, K. (1938). To V. Benussi. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology (pp. 371-378). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Traubner & Company.

Köhler, W. (1970). Gestalt Psychology. An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corporation.

Köhler, W. (1971). The Selected Papers of Wolfgang Köhler (M. Henle, Ed.). New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corporation.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The Structure of Behavior (A. L. Fisher, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964a). Signs (R. C. McCleary, Trans.). Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964b). The Primacy of Perception And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics (J. M. Edie, Trans.). Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible (A. Lingis, Trans.). Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1980). "The Nature of Perception" (F. W. Williams, Trans.). Research in Phenomenology, 10, 9-20.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2001). "Reading Notes and Comments on Aron Gurwitsch’s The Field of Consciousness" (E. Locey & T. Toadvine, Trans., S. Ménasé, Ed.). Husserl Studies, 17, 173-193.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2010). Child Psychology and Pedagogy. The Sorbonne Lectures 1949–1952 (T. Welsh, Trans.). Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception (D. Landes, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Pintos, M. L. (2005). "Gurwitsch, Goldstein, Merleau-Ponty. Analyse d’une étroite relation." Chiasmi International, 6, 147-171.

Pintos-Peñaranda, M. L. (2016). "Aron Gurwitsch at the Dawn of French Phenomenology: From a Relative Invisibility to an Indelible Mark." Schutzian Research, 8, 37-73.

Toadvine, T. (2001). "Phenomenological Method in Merleau-Ponty’s Critique of Gurwitsch." Husserl Studies, 17, 195-205.

Wertheimer, M. (1922). "Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt, I." Psychologische Forschung, 1, 47-58.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-22

How to Cite

Lind, E. (2022). Gestalt theory and phenomenological method in Gurwitsch and Merleau-Ponty. Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences, 2(2), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.62506/phs.v2i2.125