Pensamiento, Rápido y Lento, en el Mundo de la Vida: Una Comparación de las Interpretaciones del Sentido Común de D. Kahneman y A. Schutz
Una Comparación de las Interpretaciones del Sentido Común de D. Kahneman y A. Schutz
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62506/phs.v5i1.163Palabras clave:
Sentido común, Fenomenología, Psicología, SociologíaResumen
Este artículo examina comparativamente las interpretaciones del sentido común que Daniel Kahneman (K) proporciona en su libro más vendido del New York Times, Thinking, Fast and Slow (TFS) (2011) y Alfred Schutz deriva a través de su fenomenología del mundo de la vida (Lebenswelt) de la actitud natural. El proyecto revisa las interpretaciones del sentido común de K y S, establece sus correspondencias y diferencias básicas, y concluye con observaciones sobre su complementariedad.
Citas
Abel, T. (1975). Verstehen I and Verstehen II. Theory and Decision, 6(1), 99-102.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday.
Gurwitsch, A. (1966). Introduction. In I. Schutz (Ed.), Collected Papers III: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy (pp. xi-xxxi). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology (D. Cairns, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Husserl, E. (1997). Experience and Judgment (Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic) (J. S. Churchill & K. Ameriks, Trans. L. Landgrebe Ed.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341-350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Natanson, M. (1962). Introduction. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality (pp. xxv-xlvii). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Richardson, W. J. (1967). Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Ricoeur, P. (1967). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology (E. G. Ballard & L. E. Embree, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Schutz, A. (1943). The problem of rationality in the social world. Economica, 10(38), 130-149. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2549460
Schutz, A. (1944a). Some leading concepts of phenomenology. Social Research, 12(1), 77-97.
Schutz, A. (1944b). The stranger: An essay in social psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 49(6), 499-507. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/219472
Schutz, A. (1945). On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5(4), 533-576. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2102818
Schutz, A. (1946). The well-informed citizen: An essay on the social distribution of knowledge. Social Research, 13(4), 463-478.
Schutz, A. (1950). Language, language disturbances, and the texture of consciousness. Social Research, 17(3), 365-394.
Schutz, A. (1951). Choosing among projects of action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 12(2), 161-184.
Schutz, A. (1953a). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 14(1), 1-38. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2104013
Schutz, A. (1953b). Edmund Husserl’s Ideas, Volume II. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 13(3), 394-413. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2103940
Schutz, A. (1954). Concept and theory formation in the social sciences. The Journal of Philosophy, 51(9), 251-273. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2021812
Schutz, A. (1955). Symbol, reality and society. In L. Bryson, L. Finkelstein, H. Hoagland, & R. M. MacIver (Eds.), Symbols and Society: Fourteenth Symposium on Science, Philosophy, and Religion (pp. 135-203). New York: Harper and Brothers.
Schutz, A. (1962a). Husserl’s Importance for the social sciences. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Alfred Schutz Collected Papers I. The Problem of Social Reality (pp. 140-149). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1962b). Phenomenology and the social sciences. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected Papers: The Problem of Social Reality (pp. 118-139). Dordrecht: Springer.
Schutz, A. (1966a). The problem of transcendental intersubjectivity in Husserl. In I. Schutz (Ed.), Collected Papers III: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy (pp. 51-83). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1966b). Type and eidos in Husserl’s late philosophy. In I. Schutz (Ed.), Collected Papers III: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy (pp. 92-115). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Simon, H. A. (1992). What is an “explanation” of behavior? Psychological Science, 3(3), 151-161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00017.x
Spiegelberg, H. (1982). The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction (Third and revised ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2002: Daniel Kahneman - Facts. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/kahneman/facts/
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Walsh, G. (1967). Introduction (G. Walsh & F. Lehnert, Trans.). In The Phenomenology of the Social World
