The Forms Of Sympathy And Understanding Of Others’Experiences In Scheler.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62506/phs.v1i2.28Keywords:
Feelings, sympathy, love, knowledge of each otherAbstract
The objective is to describe the main features of the sympathy phenomenon from Max Scheler’s phenomenology. The central problem is to show how sympathy shows itself as a privileged “place” for understanding the experiences of others, because it implies a psychic-affective identification with whom one sympathizes and accepts. However, compassion and co-rejoicing cannot be understood as the apprehension of psychic contents unrelated to
the reproduction of the feelings of the other, equating mistakenly sympathizing with emotional infection. Consequently, in the first place, some reasons and ways of transformations of anthropologies and historical consolidation of the modern ratio that led to such mistake are outlined. Then, after distinguishing the plural forms of sympathy, showing its law of internal reasoning, the discussion turned to the meaning of how sympathy is to suffer and to rejoice by spelling out its intentional structure. To know the other, however, is not only to unite affectionately with others, but the free decision, proper of a spiritual being, to take part in the opening of the personal being of others, to participate in their intentional acts. It follows, then, that sympathizing presupposes the supreme form of love.
References
Freud, S. (2011). Mal-estar na civilização. São Paulo: Penguin Classics/Companhia das Letras.
Heidegger, M. (2006). Was ist das – die Philosophie?. In Martin Heidegger. Identität und Differenz (pp. 3-26). GA 11. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
Husserl, E. (1996). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die tranzendentale Phänomenologie. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Jung, C. G. (1988). Approaching the unconscious. In C.G. Jung. Man and his symbols (pp. 18-103). New York: Anchor Press.
Kierkegaard, S.A. (1980). The concept of anxiety. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Nietzsche, F. (1999). Also sprach Zarathustra. KS 4. München: de Gruyter.
Scheler, M. (2000a). Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik. GW 2. Bonn: Bouvier.
Scheler, M. (2000b). Ordo Amoris. In Max Scheler. Schriften aus dem Nachlass. Zur Ethik und Erkenntnislehre (pp. 345-376). GW 10, Band I. Bonn: Bouvier. (Disponível em http://www.lusosofia.net/textos/20120726-scheler_ordo_amoris.pdf)
Scheler, M. (2007a). Das Ressentiment im Aufbau der Moral. In Max Scheler. Vom Umsturz der Werte (pp. 33-147). GW 3. Bonn: Bouvier.
Scheler, M. (2007b). Zur Idee des Menschen. In Max Scheler, M. Vom Umsturz der Werte (pp. 171-195). GW 3. Bonn: Bouvier.
Scheler, M. (2008a). Vom Sinn des Leides. In Max Scheler. Schriften zur Soziologie und Weltanschauungslehre (pp. 36-72). GW 6. Bonn: Bouvier.
Scheler, M. (2008b). Vom Verrat der Freude. In Max Scheler. Schriften zur Soziologie und Weltanschauungslehre (pp. 73-76). GW 6. Bonn: Bouvier.
Scheler, M. (2008c). Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos. In Max Scheler. Späte Schriften (pp. 7-71). GW 9. Bonn: Bouvier.
Scheler, M. (2009). Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. GW 7. Bonn: Bouvier. (English translation published in 2017, The Nature of Sympathy. Translated by Peter Heath. New York: Routledge).
Vattimo, G. (2017). O sujeito e a máscara. Nietzsche e o problema da libertação. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.