The Repetition of a Singularity: Phenomenology of Déjà Vu

Authors

  • Stefano Micali Katholieke Univesiteit Leuven
  • Fabio Caprio Leite de Castro Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62506/phs.v5i3.264

Keywords:

Contemporany Philosophy, Phenomenology, Cognitivies Sciences, Déjà Vu, Repetition

Abstract

Phenomenology aims at analyzing the constitutive moments of the different experiences by doing justice to their specific ways of appearing. By doing so, it can make visible (and therefore correct) the problematic assumptions taken as valid from the outset. These assumptions coherently distort and manipulate the phenomena in such a way that the phenomena are transformed into something radically different. The phenomenon of déjà vu is very interesting in this regard for two different reasons. Déjà vu is transformed into a different phenomenon in the field of cognitive sciences: déjà-vu is commonly understood as a simple memory error. Secondly, déjà vu implies a repetition of a unique, contingent experience. This logic of repetition is not easily compatible with the logos of empirical sciences that focus on the identification of invariant relations between general terms through experimental research and therefore requires a different approach.

References

Adorno, Theodor. 1973. Negative Dialectics. Translated by E. B. Ashton. New York: Seabury Press.

Adorno, Theodor, and Max Horkheimer. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Angell, James Rowland. 1908. Psychology. New York: Henry Holt.

Arlow, Jacob A. 1959. “The Structure of the Déjà Vu Experience.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 7: 611–63.

Augé, Marc. 1992. Non-Places: An Introduction to Anthropology of Supermodernity. Paris: Le Seuil.

Bancaud, J., Brunet-Bourgin, F., Chauvel, P., & Halgren, E. 1994. “Anatomical Origin of Déjà Vu and Vivid ‘Memories’ in Human Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.” Brain, 117: 71–90.

Bartolomei, F., Barbeau, E., Gavaret, M., Guye, M., McGonigal, A., Régis, J., & Chauvel, P. 2004. “Cortical Stimulation Study of the Role of Rhinal Cortex in Déjà Vu and Reminiscence of Memories.” Neurology, 63: 858–64.

Benjamin, Walter. 1985. Gesammelte Schriften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Benjamin, Walter. 2005. Selected Writings, vol. 2, part 2, 1931–1934. Edited by Michael W. Jennings, Howard Eiland, and Gary Smith. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bergson, Henri. 1975. “Memory of the Present and False Recognition.” In Mind-Energy, 134–85. Westport: Greenwood Press.

Bernard-Leroy, Eugène. 1898. L’illusion de fausse reconnaissance. Alcan: Paris.

Bernstein, Ira H., & Welch, Kenneth R. 1991. “Awareness, False Recognition, and the Jacoby-Whitehouse Effect.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120: 324–28.

Bloch, Ernst. 1998. Literary Essays. Translated by Andrew Joron et al. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Blumenberg, Hans. 2006. Beschreibung des Menschen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Brown, Alan S. 2004. The Déjà Vu Experience. New York: Psychology Press.

Brown, Alan S., & Marsh, Elizabeth J. 2008. “Evoking False Beliefs about Autobiographical Experience.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15: 186–90.

Brown, Alan S., & Marsh, Elizabeth J. 2009. “Creating Illusions of Past Encounter through Brief Exposure.” Psychological Science, 20: 534–38.

Brown, Alan S., & Marsh, Elizabeth J. 2010. “Digging Into Déjà Vu.” In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 53, 33–62.

Canguilhem, George. 1991. The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books.

Cleary, Anne M. 2008. “Recognition Memory, Familiarity, and Déjà Vu Experiences.” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17: 353–57.

Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Bergsonism. Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and Repetition. Translated by Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.

Deleuze, Gilles. 2000. Proust and Signs: The Complete Text. Translated by Richard Howard. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Deleuze, Gilles, & Guattari, Felix. 1994. What Is Philosophy? Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.

Dickens, Charles. 1983. David Copperfield. London: Harmondsworth.

Dugas, Ludovic. 1894. “Sur la fausse mémoire.” Revue philosophique, 37: 34–35.

Efron, Robert. 1963. “Temporal Perception, Aphasia, and Déjà Vu.” Brain, 86: 403–24.

Findler, Nicholas V. 1998. “A Model-Based Theory for Déjà Vu and Related Psychological Phenomena.” Computers in Human Behavior, 14: 287–301.

Fleminger, Simon. 1991. “The Déjà Vu Experience: Remembrance of Things Past?; Comment.” American Journal of Psychiatry, 148: 1418–19.

Fouillée, Albert. 1885. “La Mémoire et la Reconnaissance des Souvenirs.” Revue des Deux Mondes, 50: 131–62.

Freud, Sigmund. 1914. Psychopathology of Everyday Life. Translated by A. A. Brill. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Gaynard, T. J. 1992. “Young People and the Paranormal.” Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 58: 165–80.

Gellatly, Angus, Peter Banton, and Chris Woods. 1995. “Salience and Awareness in the Jacoby-Whitehouse Effect.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21: 1374–79.

Gončarov, Ivan A. 2006. Oblomov. New York: Bunim & Bannigan.

Goodale, M. A., and A. D. Milner. 1992. “Separate Visual Pathways for Perception and Action.” Trends in Neuroscience, 15: 20–25.

Grasset, Joseph. 1904. “La Sensation du ‘Déjà-Vu.’” Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique, 1: 17–22.

Halgren, Eric, Richard D. Walter, Diana G. Cherlow, and Paul H. Crandall. 1978. “Mental Phenomena Evoked by Electrical Stimulation of the Human Hippocampal Formation and Amygdala.” Brain, 101: 83–117.

Holmes, Oliver W. 1891. The Autocrat of the Breakfast Table. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Humphrey, George. 1923. The Story of Man’s Mind. Boston: Small, Maynard, & Co.

Husserl, Edmund. 1969. Zur Phänomenologie des Inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1893–1917). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; 1991. On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917). Translated by John Brough. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Husserl, Edmund. 1976. Ideen zu einer Reinen Phänomenologie und Phänomenologischen Philosophie. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; 1980. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Translated by F. Kersten. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Husserl, Edmund. 1980. Phantasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung. Zur Phänomenologie der Anschaulichen Vergegenwärtigungen. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; 2005. Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898–1925). Translated by John Brough. Dordrecht: Springer.

James, William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt.

Janet, Pierre. 1905. “A Propos du Déjà Vu.” Journal de Psychologie, 2: 289–307.

Janet, Pierre. 2005. Les Obsessions et la Psychasthénie. Paris: L’Harmattan.

Jensen, J. 1868. “Über Doppelwahrnehmungen in der Gesunden, wie in der Kranken Psyche.” Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, 25: 48–63.

Jersakova, Radka, Akira O'Connor, and Chris Moulin. 2015. “What’s New in Déjà Vu?” In Culture and Cognition: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Haque Shamsul and Sheppard Elizabeth, 137–50. Bern: Peter Lang.

Joordens, Steve, and Philip M. Merikle. 1992. “False Recognition and Perception without Awareness.” Memory and Cognition, 20: 151–59.

Kindberg, Leon. 1903. “Le Sentiment du Déjà-Vu et l’Illusion de Fausse Reconnaissance.” Revue de Psychiatrie, 7: 139–66.

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lalande, André. 1893. “Des Paramnésies.” Revue Philosophique, 36: 485–97.

Lemaître, A. 1903. “Des Phénomènes de Paramnésie.” Archives de Psychologie, 1: 101–10.

Marquard, Odo. 1981. Abschied vom Prinzipiellen. Stuttgart: Reclam.

Myers, Frederic W. H. 1895. “The Subliminal Self.” Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 11: 334–407.

Neppe, Vernon M. 1983. “The Concept of Déjà Vu.” Parapsychological Journal of South Africa, 4(1): 1–10.

Poetzl, Otto. 1926. “Zur Metaphychologie des ‘Déjà Vu.’” Imago, 12: 393–402.

Poetzl, Otto. (1917) 1960. “The Relationship Between Experimentally Induced Dream Images and Indirect Vision.” Psychological Issues, 2(3): 46–106.

Reed, Graham. 1974. The Psychology of Anomalous Experience. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Scott, Walter. 1838. Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, vol. 4. Paris: Baudry European Library.

Titchener, Edward Bradford. 1928. A Text-Book of Psychology. New York: Macmillan.

Weizkrantz, Lawrence. 1986. Blindsight: A Case Study and Implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Whittlesea, Bruce W. A., Larry L. Jacoby, and Krista Girard. 1990. “Illusions of Immediate Memory: Evidence of an Attributional Basis for Feelings of Familiarity and Perceptual Quality.” Journal of Memory and Language, 29: 716–32.

Wigan, Arthur L. 1844. The Duality of the Mind. London: Longman, Brown, & Green.

Published

2024-09-13

How to Cite

Micali, S., & Castro, F. C. L. de. (2024). The Repetition of a Singularity: Phenomenology of Déjà Vu. Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences, 5(3), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.62506/phs.v5i3.264