The Relationship of Ortega y Gasset with Phenomenology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62506/phs.v1i1.10Keywords:
Ortega y Gasset, Philosophy, Phenomenology, Historical Reason, KantianismAbstract
Ortega y Gasset’s relationship with phenomenology encompasses an antagonism of perspectives regarding the repercussion of Spanish philosophy of the twentieth century. Among these forms of conceiving this relation are the conception that Ortega formulated an original philosophy abandoning the phenomenology in the moment of proving it. His most beloved disciple, Julián Marías, passes on that vision. On the other hand, some thinkers, like Javier San Martín Sala, argues that Ortega remained a phenomenologist until the end, despite his own opinion. It occurs when Ortega confronted with Husserl’s work entitled The Crisis of the European Sciences and the Transcendental Phenomenology. Ortega believes that Husserl reformulated phenomenology due to a meeting between them both in 1934. Ortega believes that until that moment phenomenology was a radicalized form of Kantianism for believing that historical reason was lacking in its epistemological context and finally found it in the writings of the so-called last Husserl.
References
Cervantes, M. de. (2015). Dom Quixote - Volume 2. São Paulo: Penguin Companhia das Letras.
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Husserl, E. (1976). Ideen Zu Einer Reinen Phänomenologie Und Phänomenologischen Philosophie. In Husserliana. Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (2014). Investigações lógicas: Prolegômenos à Lógica Pura (Vol. I). Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária.
Marías, J. (2000). Los estilos de la Filosofía. In Renato José de Moraes (Ed.), Conferência do curso “Los estilos de la Filosofía.” Madrid. Retrieved from http://www.hottopos.com
Moura, C.A.R. de. (2014). Prefácio. In Husserl, E. Investigações lógicas: Prolegômenos à Lógica Pura (Vol. I). Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária.
O’Connor, R. (1979). Ortega’s Reformulation of Husserlian Phenomenology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 40(1), 53–63.
Olmo García, F. J. (1983). Husserl en los textos de Ortega. Logos: Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica, 18, 97–112.
Orringer, N. R. (2001). La crítica de Ortega a Husserl y a Heidegger: La influencia de Georg Misch. Revista de Estudios Orteguianos, (3), 147–166. Retrieved from http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=phil&AN=1694150
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1964). Guillermo Dilthey y la idea de la vida. In Obras completas - v. VI. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1965). Prólogo para Alemanes. In Obras Completas - v. VIII (2nd ed.). Madrid: Revista de Occidente.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1966). La rebelión de las masas. In Obras completas - v. IV. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1967). Meditações do Quixote. São Paulo: Iberoamericana.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (2011). Sobre o conceito de sensação. Revista Da Abordagem Gestáltica, 17, 217–223.
San Martín, J. (1994). Ensayos sobre Ortega. Madrid: UNED.
San Martín, J. (2012). La fenomenología de Ortega y Gasset. Madrid: Siglo veintiuno.
San Martín, J. (2013). Why declaring Ortega to be a phenomenologist is important: Reasons and difficulties. Investigaciones Fenomenológica, M, 297–312.
Spiegelberg, H. (1971). The Phenomenological Movement - v. 2 (2nd ed., Vol. 6). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-4744-8
Zahavi, D. (2012). Husserl, self and others: an interview with Dan Zahavi. AVANT Philosophical Interviews, 3(1), 113–121.
Zirión, M. A. (2001). Ideas I en español, o de cómo armaba rompecabezas Jose Gaos. In Investigaciones Fenomenológicas 3 (pp. 325–371). Madrid.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
